The (ash) history of Iceland, in my backyard – Part II

In part I we found the main bands of a excavation here in SW Iceland:

- dark band of Veidivötn 1477
- double white layer band of Hekla from 1341 (or Öraefajökull 1362) and Hekla 1104
- dark band of Vatnaöldur 870 (called the “Settlement Ash”).
- thick white layer of Hekla 3 (around 1000 BC), one of largest eruptions in Iceland.

But there are many minor layers besides the obvious ones. We will get to them now.

FIGURE 1, Below the 870 settlement ash layer, there is one unknown grey and well visible band. There is also a possible eruption of Grimsvötn and Hekla, and then we find the major Hekla 3 band. Below that, we find a thick dark band, probably from Katla, around 2200 BC, and before that we probably have the ash from the Grimsnes eruptions (dating 3500 BC). Photograph by Irpsit, all rights belonging to him, used by permission.

An unknown metalic grey layer

Above the Hekla 3 layer, there is an unknown layer. It has a strange shiny metalic gray color. This is an unknown eruption estimated between 500 AC and 500 BC. Many eruptions happened at that time, not only from Hekla and Katla, but also an eruption at Torfajökull at 150 AC, Hengill at 80 BC (which is only 20km to the west), and also in Vatnafjöll. I don’t think this ash came from Katla or Hekla, unless they erupted a different ash. This type of shiny metalic ash color is notoriously different from every other ash I have seen in Iceland. But I have seen similar shiny lava rocks in Iceland, in a few places, but I can’t remember where. Until then I cannot make a guess about the identity of this layer.

There also seems to be a brown band between the Hekla 3 and the unknown grey layer. It is probably an undated eruption of Grimsvötn, which usually has this color of ash (around 100-500 BC). There is also a light colored band (just above Hekla 3), and that is probably an eruption of Hekla (around 500-1000 BC).

Below the Hekla 3 layer, there are several bands, shown in Fig.2. We first find a thin band of orange material (at 53cm), then a very large band of dark ash (starting at 56cm), and then another broad band of orange material at around 65cm. There is a thin white layer between both broad bands of dark and orange material (not visible in Fig.2).

FIGURE 2. Below Hekla 3, there is a lot of bands to be found, upon close look. But especially notorious is one dark band around 2000 BC (56 cm deep), possibly from Katla (its something really thick), and also a double band around 5000 BC (75cm deep). Photograph by Irpsit, all rights belonging to him, used by permission.

Around 1500-2000 BC: Torfajökull and Katla?

The first thin orange band is estimated at around 1500 BC. The most likely candidate is the eruption of Torfajökull around 1200 BC, because it tend to erupt such colorful rhyolite ash. The broad grey band is estimated around 2200 BC. Most likely it was one strong eruption from Katla (tephra N4 or N2). What is was, it was big, because this is a thick layer. However around this time, we also had records of an eruptions at Langjökull, dated as ~2050 BC, which was actually nearby, only 40km north (it’s closer than Hekla), in a small shield volcano named Lambahraun. If the eruption started explosively, then its ash might have reached here, but officially there is no known ash from the Langjökull volcanoes and I also don’t expect that even a nearby shield volcano would deposit such a major amount of ash. So we stay with Katla.

Hekla 4 and Grimsnes eruptions (2300 to 4200 BC)

The thin white band is probably the eruption of Hekla4, around 2300 BC, which was a very large eruption. The broad orange material is almost likely from nearby Grimsnes volcano, that erupted several times circa 3500 to 4200 BC. I am actually inside Grimsnes volcanic region; its monogenic cones are just 5-8 km away. During the Grimsnes eruptions, there was some local ash fall. The volcano is just composed of crater rows, with one major explosion crater and the other cones being a deep red. It’s no wonder that the layers from Grimsnes eruptions are of a similar color.

FIGURE 3. Grimsnes volcano, located only 5km away. Its the smallest active volcanic system in Iceland, producing crater rows every few thousand years. It produces plenty of iron-red rock material. In the picture, we see Seydisholar volcanic cone, with Búrfell pleistocene volcano in the background (this is another Búrfell; and behind it lies Hengill to one side and Langjökull to the other) Photograph by Irpsit, all rights belonging to him, used by permission.

Hekla 5 and Botnahraun/Laki, or Holmsá fires eruptions, or Thjorsáhhraun (5000-6000 BC)?

At around 75cm deep (estimated at 5000 BC) we find what looks like a double layer: white material above and a deep dark brown below. It is easy to assign this white material to Hekla5 (another large Hekla eruption at 5050 BC). The brown material underneath is unknown, but likely Grimsvötn. Possibly the Botnahraun/Laki eruption. Alternatively it might also correspond to another big eruption at this time: the Holmsá fires, another Eldgjá-like fissure that opened to the east of Katla. And still it might also be the Thjorsáhraun lava from Bardarbunga/Veidivötn, around 6600 BC. That lava actually travelled some 200km from Veidivötn towards the southwest, passing only cross 5km east from this location. That is the largest lava field on Earth since the ice age.

And now we get even older in time… Seydisholar 7000 BC

Below this point, it starts to get complicate to assign the identity of any layer because of a mud deposit underneath. There is some orange material just above it, which I assume it might have been the eruption of Seydisholar at 7000 BC, from the nearest Grimsnes crater row. That was the largest eruption of the Grimsnes system, with an estimated VEI4. And I am just a few kms from it.

Saksunarvatn ash 8000 BC?

At some points, there is a strange thick dark brown band around this depth, at around 70-80cm (see Fig. 4), which could have been the famous Saksunarvatn ash layer (Grimsvötn, 8000 BC): the largest eruption in Iceland in the Holocene. This ash is widespread recorded in northern Europe, and is used as an important marker dating the beginning of the Boreal period (end of the Young Dryas glaciation). Both the double layer (the 5000-6000 BC, referred before) and this deep dark brown layer, seem to ondulate, with one sometimes appearing over the other, and then exchanging positions. Their age is therefore highly uncertain.

Figure 4. Overall of our soil profile, with major bands identified. We cannot go before 8000 BC, as mud was deposited. Photograph by Irpsit, all rights belonging to him, used by permission.

The tale of a river bed, nearer sea levels, and also the ice age

Below 90cm we mostly find mud. This might have been a time when glaciers were over this region. At the glaciation peak, the ice sheet must have been at least 400m thick here, because of the nearby tuya Ingolfsfjall. However the peak glaciation must have been short, because we find much more shield volcanoes at this region than tuyas. About 5 km north, there is a large moraine, from where most of the time the large glacier terminated. For most of the ice age I was just at outside of the glacier.

The mud might been also caused by nearby Hvitá river (which drains the now distant Langjökull). The excavation is just next to a waterfall-like valley, thay I know it was the path of Hvitá river now 2km east.  Therefore it might been subject to much soil erosion and river deposits sometime before 8000 BC.

In early post-glacial time, the sea level was higher and the coast was actually nearby. There is actually evidende of a coast just 5km south (in the nearby shield volcano Hestfjall). The sea must have been pretty close and again this location was subject to much erosion. Because of all these reasons, we possibly do not have the record for the famous Vedde Ash (Katla 10.000 BC), which is one of the two largest eruptions in Iceland in recent millenia; the other was the Grimsvötn Saksunarvatn ash (both VEI6). In one spot, I did see some white material around 90cm deep, but I am unsure if this was it.

Ancient Lava (from Lyndhalsheidi)

Finally, on the bottom of the excavation, around 1.5m deep, there is a bedrock of lava rock (visible at some spots at lesser depths, such as in Fig.2). They are eroded and rounded (probably by the last glaciation). This is lava from the shield volcano Lyndhalsheidi that is just 8km northwest. Its lava actually flowed where I now stand, but that eruption was on the interglacial before the last glacial, so it was a long ago. However the glaciation continuously exposed and eroded that ancient bedrock.

Layers near the surface

There is no significant ash layer since the 1477 Veidivötn ash. However we can see sometimes faint layers from recent eruptions. One black layer around 5cm is probably the VEI5 Katla 1918. One faint white layer at 8cm is probably Hekla 1845 eruption. And a faint dark layer around 12cm is probably Laki 1783 (but it could have been the eruptions of Katla in 1755 or 1721; not visible in Fig.5).

FIGURE 5. Ash layers from recent eruptions in Iceland. There are not as continuous as the bigger ones, they only appear here and there. One can also see that the main white layer are actually two distinct white bands. The ash of 1477 is also double but because it started as a first eruption of rhyolite pink ash from Torfajökull, followed by basaltic brown ash of Veidivötn later. Photograph by Irpsit, all rights belonging to him, used by permission.

ICELANDIC ASH RECORDED IN GREENLAND

FIGURE 6. Again, an overview of the soil profile, but now using the initial picture form part I, and color enhanced. It’s exciting to contemplate the history of 10.000 years of eruptions in such a small soil wall. Photograph by Irpsit, all rights belonging to him, used by permission.

To finish today I read some papers that described which ash layers appeared in Greenland ice cores. We find there the 1362 Öraefajokull, 1104 Hekla, 870 Vatnaöldur ash, Hekla 3 and Hekla 4 eruptions, the very large ash layers of Saksunarvatn/ Grimsvötn (8000 BC) and Vedde / Katla (10000 BC), followed by many ash layers from Katla, Hekla or Grimsvötn, and finally other two very large ash layers: one from Tindfjallajökull Thorsmörk ignimbrite, 53.000 years ago (that was a VEI6+, and possibly even a VEI7). The volcano is still dormant now and right next to Katla and Eyjafjallajökull); the other big eruption was 300.000 years ago, and hypothesized to be from Krafla or Hofsjökull.

After this lenghty post, please feel free to call me a big ash hole.

IRPSIT

Editors note: Do click on the images, then you will see all of the details since they are rather large.

Update by Spica:
Here is the link to part I of the story.

Hellisheidahraun Lava

Photographer: Eggert Nordahl, all rights reserved. Notice the pipelines up to the left, and the SIL sticking out ontop of the further crater rim.

Hello Everyone!

I wish to congratulate the winners of this weeks competition. I had done a lot to the image by Eggert Nordahl. I croped it to remove the Hellisheidarvirkjun pipelines on the left of the picture, and I also croped off the Hellisheidar-SIL. Then I inverted it to further bungle up any Google Image Searches.

Map showing where the mystery lava image was taken. As you all notice it is slap bang between the various bore-holes.

So, Alan caught the surface lavas, Irpsit nicked the Grámosi and the Hengill points, and finally Spica had the Hellisheidi eruption (in Icelandic Hellisheidahraun).

While coasting around for info on Hengill I found a drill core that had been analyzed. It seems like Hengill has had not less then 5 different magma-zones. I think the weirdest would be the chloro-epidote stage. If I understand it correctly chloro-epidotes are constructed by forsterite (olivine) is quenched into a salt-brine. This phase would of course be from the time when Hengill was rather suffering from being sub-aquatic (before it rose out of the sea). I guess that Alan will let me know if I got this all wrong and in no uncertain terms.

So, to round it off, one could say that the image is from the Hellisheidarvirkjun Powerplant.

CARL

Tungnafellsjökull – Tectonic Earthquakes

Photograph by our own Jamie. Tungnafellsjökull seen from Sprengisandur area. Notice that the Jökull is almost gone from Tungnafellsjökull, soon to become known as Tungnafjöll only.

There has been an earthquake swarm at the northern end of the Tungnafellsjökull during the evening and throughout the night. The swarm is still ongoing. There has been a lot of speculation out there in the blogosphere about it being volcanic in nature. It is not, it is purely tectonic.

As some of you know Iceland is divided by the Mid Atlantic Rift (MAR). The MAR in turn is divided in Iceland into two separate active seismic zones, the Eastern and the Western Icelandic Seismic Zone. Lately it has been the EISZ that has been most active of the two. But the WISZ is not in any way dead or dormant. Both of them are driven by the spreading of the MAR. From the WISZ the North American Plate is spread, and from the EISZ the Eurasian Plate is spread. In between them are two micro-plates that have formed by volcanism caused by the rifting.

The map is showing the Icelandic Volcanic Zones, where the MAR runs up into Iceland, where the MAR leaves Iceland and the more important volcanic features. The Icelandic Seismic Zones are corresponding to the volcanic zone.

Along both the WISZ and EISZ are lines of volcanoes spread, it is where the spreading causes magma to pour up and fill the spaces created by the spreading.

If you look at the map you see that WISZ runs from Hengill, up to Langjökull (2 known volcanoes), via Hofsjökull (at least one volcano), onwards through Tungnafellsjökull, and then ending up at the triple-junction at Bárdarbunga.

During the last few years the area of Tungnafellsjökull has been inactive, but there is ample evidence of it having been tectonically active, something that can be found in the Sprungur (tectonic faults) found in the area. The dormancy is likely due to the area having been locked at depth, probably by old magma that has solidified the area.

Various versions of tectonic faulting. Tungnafellsjökull is suffering from strike-slip faulting.

Lately the area has been subject to an uplift not seen in Iceland since de-glaciation after the last Ice age. This is due to the melting and diminishing of the glaciers of Tungnafellsjökull (almost gone) and Vatnajökull. This uplift process has accelerated during the last decade. It is now up to 3 cm year in the area according to Sigrún Hreinsdottir (source, private email). Yes, the famed inflation of Hamarinn is not happening, it is a combination of Grimsvötn motion and isostatic rebound.

This motion might have started to release the seismic lock at Tungnafellsjökull. If that is so, there is a risk that the swarm of earthquakes is just precursor quakes for a large earthquake.

This map shows the features discussed in this text in relation to the Bárdarbunga triple-junction and the hotspots location.

What makes this interpretation the more likely one is that there is no discernible evidence of any harmonic tremoring during the earthquakes. This makes it into tectonic seismicity, not magmatic seismicity.

If there would be a large earthquake that tears the rift-lock, then magmatic movements could start in the area, but not before that. Worst case scenario here is not a volcanic eruption; it is a 6M earthquake as the slip-lock disintegrates over a large area.

Another thing that I want to point out, the earthquakes are all of low probability and some of them are as I write this due to change after revision, and some of them will be removed due to being false representations of earthquakes, so called Ghosts. And as I wrote this IMO has started to revision the earthquakes, right now there is at least one at 3M.

CARL

Update: El Hierro & Iceland

Photograph showing Malpaso, El Hierro.

El Hierro

IGN and Pevolca have given us the final good bye of the volcanic vent affectionately known as Bob. It is the fifth time that they declare that the activity is dead. I also note that they claim that they “have put an end to the eruption”. I for one did not know that humanity could put an end to any eruption.

In the same missive they say that there is still tremoring and inflation going on, and that the earthquakes are ongoing. And I who thought this was signs that you should not state that an eruption had ceased.

On the contrary the volcano seems to have been rather active, and has by now reached a distance of only 88 meters from the surface. This with the above given signs make the Pevolca statement rather iffy in my opinion.

Another thing is that the low level harmonic tremor has steadily increased for a week; it is best seen on the EOSO and EGOM stations. This tremor at 0.59 and 0.3 respectively is a sign that most likely is associated with deep magmatic movement. Due to the wave-length a wave of such a low frequency cannot build in a narrow tube or small magmatic chamber. The increase probably means that new magma is moving upwards.

Either we should see new activity at the old vents around Bob, or a new vent formation will take place in the coming week or so.

Iceland

Photograph by Ragnar Palmason. Showing red Brimstone in a volcanic cave of Brennisteinsfjöll.

After the medium sized earthquake swarm that took place at the MAR 20 km to the SSW of Reykjavik there have been reports of HS2 gas smell in the vicinity. The first one to report that was our own commenter Irpsit, who went trekking in the area of Lake Thingvellir. He reported strong smell on both sides of the lake, and that it numbed his nose within minutes. This tells us that the concentration was higher than is technically good for you. The danger with HS2 is that numbs the nose and then you can get into an area with poisonous levels of gas.

It is interesting that the gas emission rate in that area has increased after the 4.2M earthquake swarm. It probably means that in some way one of the volcanic systems in the area was affected since the area is rather large and requires more than a little gas puffing up to affect the nose in such away on both sides of the lake.

In reality there could only have been two volcanoes responsible for this emission, one of them is of course Hengill. Hengill is the largest of the volcanoes in that part of Iceland. But, I would like to make the culprit into Brennisteinsfjöll.

Photograph by Freysteinn Sigurðsson. The photograph shows weathered brimstone (sulphuric oxides) at Brennisteinsfjöll.

 

It erupted at 1000AD, 1200AD and at 1341AD. What makes into a likely culprit is that it is known to stink. The actual meaning of the name of the volcano says it all. Etymology is sometimes a useful science for volcanological purposes. Brennisteinsfjöll quite simply means Burnstone Mountain, or even more precisely, the Mountain of Brimstone.

Brennisteinsfjöll normally erupts in an effusive fissure style yielding between 0.2 to 3 cubic kilometers of lava. Two of the eruptions have VEI-2 numbers, the latest during 950AD. So if it erupts it should not be an ashy affair. At least at long as the lake does not get involved.

CARL