Debunking Caldera Myths

Post by cbus20122:

Before this post gets read, I would like to note that I am not a scientist or geologist. If any information is inaccurate in this post, I would like to encourage the more scientifically inclined to correct me and inform readers if there are any inaccuracies!

Caldera Volcanoes.. The Mythological Beast of Volcanology

Aniakchak Caldera - Alaska

Image Wikimedia Commons : Aniakchak Caldera – Alaska

If you’ve ever paid attention to volcanoes, there is a good chance you’re familiar with what a caldera is. For those who are new to the terminology, a caldera is a collapse structure that forms when the magma chamber below a volcano empties, leaving the overlying rock to subside into the ground. Calderas are to volcanoes what an atom bomb is to explosives. They’re the largest, most destructive, and rarest variety around, and because of that, they’re incredibly interesting.

Caldera forming eruptions are interesting and notable to scientists and casual observers alike since they’re both rare, and incredibly powerful. In fact, some caldera-forming eruptions can be so powerful, that they’ve been associated with global climate change, and small-scale extinction events. Due to their potentially cataclysmic nature, there is a lot of misinformation and doom & gloom in the press and media.
Chances are, you’ve heard the title “supervolcano”. The term “supervolcano” was coined by the media to describe the largest caldera-forming eruptions on earth. Ever since the inception of the term, it’s been used to describe any massive volcanic eruption, the likes which haven’t been seen in the modern era. So what are some common myths about calderas and supervolcanoes? Read the guide below!

Debunking Myths Associated With Calderas

MythThere Are Only 6-7 Supervolcanoes on Earth

Somewhere along the line, the media decided that there were less than 10 supervolcanoes on earth. This myth is a bit difficult to dispel, because there is no real cutoff between “supervolcano” and “really large caldera” as it’s not a true scientific term.

Campi Flegrei in Italy is frequently described as a supervolcano, yet it’s not even 1/10 the size of Lake Toba. If we were to assume that Campi Flegrei is a proper supervolcano, then that means there are over 100 known supervolcanoes on our planet, and it would be on the lower end of the size spectrum. If we’re defining “supervolcano” by capability of producing a VEI – 8 eruption, then it’s true that there are only a few volcanic systems with this capability.

Myth – All Calderas form from explosive eruptions

While more calderas form as a result of a violent eruption, some caldera systems form from a gradual subsistence. Hawaiian volcanoes have calderas that formed slowly following the gradual effusion of basaltic magma, which caused a gradual drop in the size of the magma chamber. Subsistence calderas form most often in mafic shield volcanoes, which are common in oceanic hotspots such as the Galapagos, or the Hawaiian Islands.

Myth – Volcanoes that have had a violent caldera forming eruption are extremely violent by nature

Caldera forming eruptions are more of a cyclical process then they are indicative of a Volcano’s overall nature. Even extremely violent and active volcanoes such as Krakatoa show that they’ll stay active with small-scale eruptions post-collapse. A caldera-forming event typically happens only after a volcanic system has been “plugged” up for a long enough time, allowing pressure to build and magma to evolve to a degree that it can erupt in a dramatic fashion. For some volcanoes, this takes a very long time, others like Krakatoa can recharge much quicker. Some caldera volcanoes will create multiple massive caldera-forming eruptions. Others will only go massive one time, then they’ll sprout several smaller volcanoes after the initial caldera collapse event.

It’s also important to note that there are different varieties of explosive calderas. Caldera volcanoes formed from andesitic arc-volcanism behave in a much different fashion than Caldera volcanoes that form from basaltic rift-oriented volcanism, which typically erupt effusive basalt eruptions, but can create massive rhyolitic eruptions on rare occasion. These caldera systems are usually indicative of a large heat source (basaltic magma) transforming country rock into Rhyolite (the most explosive variety of magma) which later erupts after being disturbed by a fresh injection of basaltic magma.

Myth – Supervolcanoes Are Formed By Hotspots

The largest caldera systems in the world all have a few things in common, yet being hot spot volcanoes is not a similar trait they share. In fact, Yellowstone is the only supervolcano that is known to be formed in association with a mantle plume (hot spot), whereas most other supervolcanoes are located in subduction arcs. What they do have in common is extremely hot and shallow heat sources, typically produced by continental rifting. Rifting occurs when land pulls apart due to largely tectonic reasons. Rifting lowers underlying pressure and thins the surface, which in turn pulls magma and hot rock closer to the surface. Eventually, these large shallow heat sources melt and evolve country rock (often granite) into our familiar friend Rhyolite. If you accumulate enough Rhyolite, let it evolve for a long enough time, then set it off with a fresh injection of magma, you have the ingredients for a massive eruption.

For Yellowstone, the heat source comes from the mantle plume, instead of a rift-oriented heat source (although it’s likely some rifting is occurring as well).

Google Earth Overlays For Caldera Systems – Calderas Outlined in Green or Red (screenshots)

Ecuador Calderas

Ecuador has quite a few massive caldera systems, with the Chacana caldera being the largest

Kamchatka Calderas

Of the 11 large calderas in Kamchatka, the smallest is still 10 square KM..

Cbus20122

Eifel Volcanic Field I

Few volcanic areas in the world are as easily accessible and in such a friendly environment as the Eifel Volcanic Field. Volcanophiles generally know of the existence of this volcanic field and that it lies somewhere in western Germany. Most ordinary people however have no idea that an active volcanic field with some 200+ volcanoes is located in western Germany, some 25 km from Belgium, 50 km from Luxemburg and 80 km from The Netherlands.

Lush, green, easily accessible and previously quite dangerous. The Shire might have been here before. Image by author.

The field is generally located around the towns and cities of Hillesheim, Gerolstein, Daun, Mayen and Koblenz. The world-famous racing circuit of the Nürburgring (Nordschleife) actually lies around and in between a few volcanic cones, of which the “Hohe Acht” is the most famous one because it’s also the highest point in the Eifel hills.

If you believe some of the more sensation oriented media, you will be led to believe that the Eifel is actually an inflated supervolcano, which has already shown its potential at Laacher See (one of 2 caldera features in the volcanic field) and is just waiting to end civilization as we know it anywhere between Scandinavia, the UK, Spain and the Balkan countries. We’ve all read those articles and wondered if 99% or 100% of it was made up on the spot.

In fact, volcanic activity in the Eifel Volcanic Field has been almost exclusively monogenetic, leaving scoria cones, tuff rings, lava flows and maars scattered over the hills since about 700.000 years ago. The Eifel is the type locality for “maars”, so activity like this all over the world is named after the volcanic lakes in these hills. On one occasion, a significantly larger (one of the most recent) eruption occurred, which left the Laacher See caldera. The good thing about all this activity is that there are a lot of volcanic features to visit and they are almost all very easy to reach. No mountaineering skills are needed and no supplies need to be carried because all this is in the middle of the civilized world.

Scoria cone hidden in the trees in the middle of a field. No guided tour needed here. Image by author.

Once you reach the crater area, you suddenly realize this is the real deal, even though the surroundings don’t look like it. Image by author

The “Vulkanmuseum” in Daun is worth a visit if you have some spare time. A lot of things are explained and a lot of good information is provided. This too can be said about most volcanic features in the Eifel. At many cones and maars you will find information signs with tons of useful information about the volcanic feature you are visiting.

Of special interest are the cold-water Geysers that are found in the Eifel. They are not driven by heat, but by CO2. The CO2 escaping from the magma sources below the Eifel dissolves into the groundwater at some places. Whenever the amount of dissolved CO2 reaches a critical point, bubbles start forming, lowering the hydrostatic pressure of the underlying water, triggering the formation of more bubbles etc etc. This chain reaction, when combined with a ‘conduit’ leading to surface, is what drives the geyser, until enough CO2 has been released to restore the stable situation again. The one in Wallenborn (Geyser Brubbel) is quiet for about 35 minutes and ejects cold water for about 2 minutes. Almost perfect for a visit! The one in Andernach is actually the world’s highest cold-water geyser. If you cannot go and visit them there, just buy a bottle of Gerolsteiner water to play Volcano at home. This world-famous mineral water is extracted from a drilled well and is naturally carbonated by the volcanic field. Shake the bottle firmly, open the cap and you have your own Eifel Coldwater Geyser at home.

If you happen to be a big beer fan, you might want to visit the Vulkanbrauerei (Volcanobrewery) in Mendig, close to the Laacher See. They produce and sell various beer specialties and have a very cool underground cellar (felsenkeller) open for visitors, that is cut out of columnar basalt, which they claim is the deepest beercellar in the world. It certainly sounds awesome to have a huge cellar to keep your beer cold, cut out of columnar basalt underneath/inside an old lava flow.

Already a nice place for a swinging chair. Once you know of the maar below and the scoria cones in the distance, it suddenly gets even better, especially if you took your beer from the Vulkanbrauerei. Image by author.

If you ever happen to be near the Eifel and have a spare day or so, I think this area is definitely worth a visit. Don’t expect any huge and spectacular volcanoes, dangerous trips or much live activity, because most features are quite hidden and somewhat influenced by erosion. The area is kind of like the old Petting zoo of the volcanic realm with some very cool animals in it.

A group of German Crater Deer having a good time inside an old volcanic crater. Image by author.

In part II, chryphia will give some more info on the Eifel Volcanic Field in a follow up post. Thanks to chryphia and Spica for helping out on this one!

El Nathan

———————————————————————–

Name that Volcano Riddle ……

 1 volcano 1 point
 
During the 1960s ‘cold war’, a discovery in a cavern under this volcano raised the spectre of an impending rocket attack …. SOLVED
Talla 1 point for Shinmoedake – some scenes from the 1967 You Only Live Twice were filmed on locationn at this volcano! (Spectre’s rocket base!)
Kilgharrah

Volcanic Mishaps 2: Mono Lake, California.

Mono Lake, from Wikimedia Commons.

Tufa Outcrops, Mono Lake.
Image from Wikimedia Commons.

We had 2 weeks in California; after a weekend in San Francisco and some chillaxin’ by the pool in Sacramento; we took the roadtrip of a lifetime. (many thanks Val x) We visited Lake Tahoe, Mono Lake, Yosemite, Mariposa and drove back to Sacramento via Route 49; the gold rush route…

Trees were more my thing in those days, I armed myself with Stuart and Sawyer’s Trees and Shrubs of California; (ISBN 0520221095) bought for $8 in a second hand bookstore in Berkeley and managed to tick off a fair few… Including this baby:

416px-Grizzly_Giant_Mariposa_Grove

The Grizzly Giant, species: Sequoiadendron giganteum.
From Wikimedia commons.

Statistics: 63.7m high (somewhat truncated by a lightning strike, I guess…) Circumference at ground level: 29.5m, Diameter at 1.5 m from the ground: 7.8m, Estimated bole volume: 963m^3 and old enough to have lived through the action described below!!!

It wasn’t much of a mishap, more of an oversight… We were visiting because my girlfriend (at the time) had seen a picture; something like the one above, and had fallen in love with the desolate beauty of the place. So we went and looked around; we saw the tufa rock formed by accretion of materials at hydro thermal vents and exposed when Los Angeles began tapping Mono Lake’s tributaries; the lake itself is highly saline/ alkaline. We saw Black Point, formed under a much deeper Mono Lake 13,000 years ago; now a flattened cone of basaltic debris. We had a good long look at Negit Island; built by several eruptive episodes between 1600 and 270 years ago. We goggled at Paoha Island created by a magmatic intrusion under the lake between 1720 and 1850; it has an exposed section of rhyolite and 7 (count em’) dacite cinder cones! There was a seismic swarm in 1980 including EQs of up to 6mag (estimated, richter scale) and another in the nearby White Mountain fault in 1986.

Mono Lake is not the whole story; to the south there are a series of domes, coulees, flows and craters stretching all the way to the Inyo Craters; many of these were formed in a series of violent eruptions ~600 years ago. When I say violent I mean phreatomagmatic explosions followed by the opening of a 6km multi- vent fissure, pyroclastic flows affecting the Mono Lake area and then (geologically shortly afterwards) a virtual repeat 40 kms south at the Inyo Craters, followed by coulee and dome building!!! The remaining features are thought to have arisen in the last 2000 years. Mammoth Mountain and the Long Valley Caldera are nearby… Quite a piece of volcanic real estate, I think you’ll agree:

The Big Picture...

The Big Picture… Approx 50kms top to bottom.
Wikimedia commons again.

This sums it up pretty well:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mono%E2%80%93Inyo_Craters

The mishap? We were walking around in and admiring an awesome, starkly beautiful landscape, which:

“is considered one of the most likely sites for future volcanic activity in the United States”

according to Gates and Ritchie…

and I had absolutely no idea it was even a volcanic landscape until “yesterday” when I was glancing through their book!!!

Schtevie x

Disclaimer: The author is an amateur blogger and has absolutely no quailifications as a geologist or anything of the sort.

The article is not implying that “something is going on” and should give you no cause for concern at this time.

See the USGS website linked below for up to date information.

References

The United States Geological Survey:

http://www.usgs.gov/

Webcam:

http://www.monolake.org/today/mlcam

Inspiration for the article from:

Gates and Ritchie’s; Encyclopedia of Earthquakes and Volcanoes, 3rd edition. ISBN0816063028.

Not really a reference; (I nearly put my back out when I picked it up from under the tree!!!) but destined to be a new favourite:

Encyclopedia of Volcanoes; editor in chief Haruldar Sigurdsson. ISBN 012643140x.


GeoLurking Link Recommendations for the nitty gritty. (Note, all links provided documents even though some are in paywall company sites)

“Monitoring Unrest in a Large Silicic Caldera, the Long Valley-Inyo Craters Volcanic Complex in East-Central California” Hill (1984)

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01961568

“Comparison of risk from pyroclastic density current hazards to critical infrastructure in Mammoth Lakes, California, USA, from a new Inyo craters rhyolite dike eruption versus a dacitic dome eruption on Mammoth Mountain” Kaye et al (2009)

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11069-009-9465-1?LI=true#page-1

“Elastic source model of the North Mono eruption (1325–1368 A.D.) based on shoreline deformation” Shaffer (2010)

http://lycaste.geology.buffalo.edu/monoinyo/downloads/publications/ShBuRe10.pdf

“THE GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE INYO VOLCANIC CHAIN: MULTIPLE MAGMA SYSTEMS IN THE LONG VALLEY REGION, EASTERN CALIFORNIA” Daniel E. Sampson and Kenneth L. Cameron (1987)

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/JB092iB10p10403/abstract

Copied from comments for completeness, Schteve.

…………..

 

Sheepy Dalek:

Alan C Evil Riddel:

Ladies beware! If you have badly fitting undies, you may find me!!

What am I?
What are my origins?
2 points
I hope you ladies aren’t offended by this one 

Riddle – Name Those Volcanoes 
7 Dings 7 points

Variety number 9280, No 1 is used to produce a splendid accompaniment to VC riddle solving!

French FIS WC silver medalist might have crashed on No 2 whilst he learnt to snowboard-cross

No 3 The ‘toy’ volcano (photo below)

16762 No 4 is potentially hazardous and unstable

No 5’s new island emerged, bravely flew the Portuguese flag & vanished just 20 days later

No 6 (photo below)

With a No 7 Bang Bang I wish us all a belated, but very happy & peaceful New Year!

Spica

Mt. Snowdon

Snowdon using Googleearth by Karenz

View of Mount Snowdon using Googleearth by Karenz.

Snowdon is the highest mountain in Wales and an extinct volcano. The summit is easily accessible on foot, by train or you can practice your mountaineering skills there – as apparently did Sir Edmund Hillary to train for the ascent of Mt Everest. I walked it; mountaineering is not one of my skills.
Snowdon is well worth a visit as it is in a national nature reserve for rare flora and fauna.

Wales has had a marked influence on geology. Early geologists defined periods based on the names of Welsh villages. “Ordovician” is named after a Celtic tribe, the Ordovices.

Snowdon formed during the Ordovician period. It is comprised of tuff with sedimentary rocks and igneous intrusions, folded into a syncline. Around 450 ma, a caldera formed, producing ash flows of rhyolitic tuff deposits up to 500 metres (1,600 ft) thick. The current summit at 1,085 metres (3,560 ft) is near the northern edge of the caldera.

Fig 1: The Snowdon Massif (Wiki Commons, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:North_snowdonia_panorama.jpg)

Fig 1: The Snowdon Massif (Wiki Commons, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
File:North_snowdonia_panorama.jpg)

Much of Wales was under water in the Ordivician period. Wales was in a back arc basin between a subduction zone and in front of the Midland Platform. The basin had both submarine and sub aerial volcanoes. While I have focussed on the volcanic activity, there was a lot of sedimentary activity occurring as well so igneous and sedimentary rocks often form consecutive layers.

Tectonic Setting

England and Wales were part of the Avalonia micro plate; Scotland was then sited on the Laurentia plate and did not join England and Wales until much later during the Caledonian Orogeny. In the early Ordovician period, Avalonia was a volcanic arc on the northern edge of Gondwana where the Iapetus ocean crust subducted under the Gondwana plate. As the Iapetus Ocean closed, Avalonia broke off from Gondwana and moved northward to eventually meet the Laurentia and Baltica plates.
The collision of the plates resulted in the Caledonian Orogeny around 490 ma to 390 ma, the building of a chain of mountains which stretched from the Appalachians, through Snowdonia and the Lake District to Norway.

Fig 2: Caledonian/Acadian Mountain Chains (Woudloper, Wiki Commons http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Caledonides_EN.svg))

Fig 2: Caledonian/Acadian Mountain Chains (Woudloper, Wiki Commons http://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/File:Caledonides_EN.svg))

Volcanic Activity

For Avalonia, volcanism of the Tremadoc era, c. 510 ma, was island arc, whereas the subsequent volcanism of the Llanvirn and Caradoc eras was characteristic of a back arc environment. Wales, itself, was the site of a back arc basin with voluminous calc-alkaline basaltic and rhyolitic volcanic activity which ended with the meeting of the three terranes in the late Ordovician. Acidic lavas were produced by subduction and basaltic lavas were produced by thinning of the crust of the back arc basin.

Fig 3: Profile of a Back Arc Basin and Subduction Zone (zyzzy2, Wiki Commons, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SubZone.jpg)

Fig 3: Profile of a Back Arc Basin and Subduction Zone (zyzzy2, Wiki Commons, http://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SubZone.jpg)

Early volcanic activity in the Tremadoc was sub aerial, followed by a period of submarine activity in the Caradoc and sub aerial again in the Ashgill.

The Snowdon Volcanic Corridor

The Snowdon volcanic corridor was built in two phases: the Llewelyn volcanic group and the Snowdon volcanic group. These are separated by sedimentary rocks.

snowdon volcanic corridor w640px

Fig 4: Snowdon Volcanic Corridor (based on a map by Nilfanion, Wiki Commons, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gwynedd_UK_relief_location_map.jpg)

The Llewelyn group had five main formations: Conway – rhyolite and ash flow lavas; Foel Fras – andesitic lava and tuffs; Foel Grach – basaltic – andesitic lava; Braich Tu Du – acidic ash flow and rhyolitic tuff; and, the Capel Curig – formation of both sub aerial and submarine acidic ash flow and tuffs.

The Snowdon Volcanic Group had three centres: Llwyd Mawr – an emerging volcanic island that produced acid ash flow tuffs that were partially contained in a subsiding caldera; Snowdon, itself; and, Crafnant –deep water acidic submarine tuffs. Snowdon evolved as initial ash flow tuffs from a series of fissures south east of the volcano. The caldera subsided as more ash was erupted. This was followed by pumice and rhyolite. Ash flow tuffs were partially contained by the caldera.
Basaltic rocks also occur alongside acidic: both intrusive and extrusive basalts are found and also hyaloclastites. The sequence is acidic followed by basaltic and then a final rhyolitic phase.

At the end of the Caradoc, most volcanic activity ceased, although there were some minor eruptions later in the region. Successive orogeny episodes led to mineralisation of the faults in the region and further uplift. There are no rocks in the area that are younger than the Triassic period. Any that might have been deposited have since been eroded. Glaciation during the Cenozaic Ice Age and subsequent erosion from wind and rain formed the current landscape, revealing the underlying geology of Snowdonia.

KarenZ, 26/12/2012.

References:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avalonia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordovician
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowdonia
“British Regional Geology Wales”, M F Howells, British Geological Survey, 2007
“Geology of Snowdonia”, Matthew Bennett, The Crowood Press, 2007.

New Hebrides – Ambrym

This really should be Ruminarian VI, but I got delayed/sidetracked in writing it. (or just plain burnt out). Someone posted a Vanuatu quake and… well, they are sort of common. Poking around at it I ran across Ambrym, and one of my discarded post ideas came back to lend an intro to this. For the sake of sanity, I hopped out of the Ruminerian sequence to the coordinating Dragon won’t pop a gasket trying to keep it straight. Ruminerian VI will logically follow V when I get around to finishing it.

I’ve sought calderas now for several weeks… I find them quite entertaining. I always get a hoot when some media bobble head yammers about “Supervolcanoes.” I’m not a geologist, and I also detest the term. My preference is “large caldera structure.” One or two media oriented sites stated that there were six known “supervolcanoes,” which is total B/S when you get right down to it. Some in the geologic community have actually adopted the term, more out of making something useful out of it rather than fight the phrase. There still isn’t a clearly defined set of standards that make one eruption super and another not super. I’m pretty sure that the residents of Yakima Washington thought Mount St Helens was pretty “super” at the time it went off… though even with the widest pseudo definition, Saint Helens was far from a “Supervolcano.” I’m sure the residents around Merapi feel the same way about their recent volcano encounter.

One breakpoint that I’ve seen mentioned, is 500 km³ of ejecta. Okay… then what about the 200 km³ eruptions? They aren’t “super?” At 200 km³ I’m pretty sure that those affected may not really give a rats arse what the definition is. So… if you break it down into “large caldera” events… they are everywhere.

The one I’m going to look at shows up in earthquake lists all of the time. It’s the system that usually pops up with the Vanuatu quakes. The name of it… is Ambrym. Mt Marum and Mt Benbow are in a state of eruption… but they are just features inside the Ambrym caldera. At 12 x 14km, Ambyrm caldera has an extent of about 132 km². It’s last major event was about 50 AD ± 100 years with a bulk Tephra volume of 7.0 (±1) x 10^10 m³. That’s not DRE (Dense Rock Equivalent), that’s bulk. You can estimate the DRE by multiplying that against the ratio of bulk density vs rock density… or about 1000 kg/m³ over 2700 kg/m³. That’s about 0.3704. That gives us a rough DRE of about 2.59 x 10^10 m³. (GVP’s generic conversion routine when you don’t have the actual densities)

Doing a quick conversion to km³, it comes out to about 2.59 km³ 25.9 km³. Not small, but hardly that impressive. Far less than what the 132 km² area of the caldera hints at. Using that formula that you guys here on VC helped to gather the data for, it comes out at 155 km³ of material associated to a caldera of that size.

Since the caldera is supposed to have formed in conjunction with that eruption, there seems to be a huge disconnect with the formula. Something on the order of around a factor of six. Why the disconnect? Because Ambyrm caldera is a collapse structure… not an eruption structure.

McCall et al note:

“The Ambrym caldera appears to have formed by quiet subsidence or by subsidence accompanied by eruption of scoria lapilli little or no different from the material that was erupted prior to and subsequent to caldera formation.”

And given that their observations indicate that the caldera walls have a youthful appearance (little erosion in a tropical environment) it is easy to see where they came up with that conclusion.

They also note that the non-collapsed slopes tend to represent the pre-collapse gradient… working off of that, I calculate that the summit max height could have been as high as about 1600 meters.

So, where is all that missing 129 km³ of material? It’s not really missing. That was part of what built the island to begin with.

Now for something that hasn’t been touched on since way before Eruptions moved to its current site. One of the users there, “Passerby” and I would trade info back and forth about processes. My knowledge was inferior to his, but I did pay attention to the stuff he put forth. One of the ideas is best described as “pleating.” Passerby noticed that in some of my plots, the quaked in the Benioff zone (aka Wadati–Benioff zone) seemed to describe a shape similar to the folding of a piece of fabric as it hit the floor… bending back and forth. This is from the nose of a subducted plate encountering resistance (either from density or from buoyancy) and folding up like slow moving molasses/taffy. It’s really remarkable when you think about it, and actually comes from the fact that rock is not the hard substance that we think it is when you get to really high pressures and temperatures. It oozes. Carrying this a bit further, as a plate subducts, it doesn’t do so in a simplistic fashion. It can bend, fold, pleat or move in any fashion that you can imagine a semi-ridged slab of not quite ridged material can. Clay, Fudge, toffee… all show similar movement characteristics.

You can see this best illustrated of you yank out all of the quakes above 50 km and look at just those associated with the Benioff zone in the area of Ambrym. Notice that the subducting slab is folding and pleating as it goes down. This is a combo graphic of a fitted poly-sheet to those quakes. This indicates roughly where the quakes are at based on what their history was, and fills the gaps so that we can mentally picture where that surface it at.

Enjoy.

GEOLURKING


“The Geology and Geophysics of the Ambrym Caldera, New Hebrides” McCall et all (1969)

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02596698?LI=true#page-1