The (ash) history of Iceland, in my backyard – Part II

In part I we found the main bands of a excavation here in SW Iceland:

- dark band of Veidivötn 1477
- double white layer band of Hekla from 1341 (or Öraefajökull 1362) and Hekla 1104
- dark band of Vatnaöldur 870 (called the “Settlement Ash”).
- thick white layer of Hekla 3 (around 1000 BC), one of largest eruptions in Iceland.

But there are many minor layers besides the obvious ones. We will get to them now.

FIGURE 1, Below the 870 settlement ash layer, there is one unknown grey and well visible band. There is also a possible eruption of Grimsvötn and Hekla, and then we find the major Hekla 3 band. Below that, we find a thick dark band, probably from Katla, around 2200 BC, and before that we probably have the ash from the Grimsnes eruptions (dating 3500 BC). Photograph by Irpsit, all rights belonging to him, used by permission.

An unknown metalic grey layer

Above the Hekla 3 layer, there is an unknown layer. It has a strange shiny metalic gray color. This is an unknown eruption estimated between 500 AC and 500 BC. Many eruptions happened at that time, not only from Hekla and Katla, but also an eruption at Torfajökull at 150 AC, Hengill at 80 BC (which is only 20km to the west), and also in Vatnafjöll. I don’t think this ash came from Katla or Hekla, unless they erupted a different ash. This type of shiny metalic ash color is notoriously different from every other ash I have seen in Iceland. But I have seen similar shiny lava rocks in Iceland, in a few places, but I can’t remember where. Until then I cannot make a guess about the identity of this layer.

There also seems to be a brown band between the Hekla 3 and the unknown grey layer. It is probably an undated eruption of Grimsvötn, which usually has this color of ash (around 100-500 BC). There is also a light colored band (just above Hekla 3), and that is probably an eruption of Hekla (around 500-1000 BC).

Below the Hekla 3 layer, there are several bands, shown in Fig.2. We first find a thin band of orange material (at 53cm), then a very large band of dark ash (starting at 56cm), and then another broad band of orange material at around 65cm. There is a thin white layer between both broad bands of dark and orange material (not visible in Fig.2).

FIGURE 2. Below Hekla 3, there is a lot of bands to be found, upon close look. But especially notorious is one dark band around 2000 BC (56 cm deep), possibly from Katla (its something really thick), and also a double band around 5000 BC (75cm deep). Photograph by Irpsit, all rights belonging to him, used by permission.

Around 1500-2000 BC: Torfajökull and Katla?

The first thin orange band is estimated at around 1500 BC. The most likely candidate is the eruption of Torfajökull around 1200 BC, because it tend to erupt such colorful rhyolite ash. The broad grey band is estimated around 2200 BC. Most likely it was one strong eruption from Katla (tephra N4 or N2). What is was, it was big, because this is a thick layer. However around this time, we also had records of an eruptions at Langjökull, dated as ~2050 BC, which was actually nearby, only 40km north (it’s closer than Hekla), in a small shield volcano named Lambahraun. If the eruption started explosively, then its ash might have reached here, but officially there is no known ash from the Langjökull volcanoes and I also don’t expect that even a nearby shield volcano would deposit such a major amount of ash. So we stay with Katla.

Hekla 4 and Grimsnes eruptions (2300 to 4200 BC)

The thin white band is probably the eruption of Hekla4, around 2300 BC, which was a very large eruption. The broad orange material is almost likely from nearby Grimsnes volcano, that erupted several times circa 3500 to 4200 BC. I am actually inside Grimsnes volcanic region; its monogenic cones are just 5-8 km away. During the Grimsnes eruptions, there was some local ash fall. The volcano is just composed of crater rows, with one major explosion crater and the other cones being a deep red. It’s no wonder that the layers from Grimsnes eruptions are of a similar color.

FIGURE 3. Grimsnes volcano, located only 5km away. Its the smallest active volcanic system in Iceland, producing crater rows every few thousand years. It produces plenty of iron-red rock material. In the picture, we see Seydisholar volcanic cone, with Búrfell pleistocene volcano in the background (this is another Búrfell; and behind it lies Hengill to one side and Langjökull to the other) Photograph by Irpsit, all rights belonging to him, used by permission.

Hekla 5 and Botnahraun/Laki, or Holmsá fires eruptions, or Thjorsáhhraun (5000-6000 BC)?

At around 75cm deep (estimated at 5000 BC) we find what looks like a double layer: white material above and a deep dark brown below. It is easy to assign this white material to Hekla5 (another large Hekla eruption at 5050 BC). The brown material underneath is unknown, but likely Grimsvötn. Possibly the Botnahraun/Laki eruption. Alternatively it might also correspond to another big eruption at this time: the Holmsá fires, another Eldgjá-like fissure that opened to the east of Katla. And still it might also be the Thjorsáhraun lava from Bardarbunga/Veidivötn, around 6600 BC. That lava actually travelled some 200km from Veidivötn towards the southwest, passing only cross 5km east from this location. That is the largest lava field on Earth since the ice age.

And now we get even older in time… Seydisholar 7000 BC

Below this point, it starts to get complicate to assign the identity of any layer because of a mud deposit underneath. There is some orange material just above it, which I assume it might have been the eruption of Seydisholar at 7000 BC, from the nearest Grimsnes crater row. That was the largest eruption of the Grimsnes system, with an estimated VEI4. And I am just a few kms from it.

Saksunarvatn ash 8000 BC?

At some points, there is a strange thick dark brown band around this depth, at around 70-80cm (see Fig. 4), which could have been the famous Saksunarvatn ash layer (Grimsvötn, 8000 BC): the largest eruption in Iceland in the Holocene. This ash is widespread recorded in northern Europe, and is used as an important marker dating the beginning of the Boreal period (end of the Young Dryas glaciation). Both the double layer (the 5000-6000 BC, referred before) and this deep dark brown layer, seem to ondulate, with one sometimes appearing over the other, and then exchanging positions. Their age is therefore highly uncertain.

Figure 4. Overall of our soil profile, with major bands identified. We cannot go before 8000 BC, as mud was deposited. Photograph by Irpsit, all rights belonging to him, used by permission.

The tale of a river bed, nearer sea levels, and also the ice age

Below 90cm we mostly find mud. This might have been a time when glaciers were over this region. At the glaciation peak, the ice sheet must have been at least 400m thick here, because of the nearby tuya Ingolfsfjall. However the peak glaciation must have been short, because we find much more shield volcanoes at this region than tuyas. About 5 km north, there is a large moraine, from where most of the time the large glacier terminated. For most of the ice age I was just at outside of the glacier.

The mud might been also caused by nearby Hvitá river (which drains the now distant Langjökull). The excavation is just next to a waterfall-like valley, thay I know it was the path of Hvitá river now 2km east.  Therefore it might been subject to much soil erosion and river deposits sometime before 8000 BC.

In early post-glacial time, the sea level was higher and the coast was actually nearby. There is actually evidende of a coast just 5km south (in the nearby shield volcano Hestfjall). The sea must have been pretty close and again this location was subject to much erosion. Because of all these reasons, we possibly do not have the record for the famous Vedde Ash (Katla 10.000 BC), which is one of the two largest eruptions in Iceland in recent millenia; the other was the Grimsvötn Saksunarvatn ash (both VEI6). In one spot, I did see some white material around 90cm deep, but I am unsure if this was it.

Ancient Lava (from Lyndhalsheidi)

Finally, on the bottom of the excavation, around 1.5m deep, there is a bedrock of lava rock (visible at some spots at lesser depths, such as in Fig.2). They are eroded and rounded (probably by the last glaciation). This is lava from the shield volcano Lyndhalsheidi that is just 8km northwest. Its lava actually flowed where I now stand, but that eruption was on the interglacial before the last glacial, so it was a long ago. However the glaciation continuously exposed and eroded that ancient bedrock.

Layers near the surface

There is no significant ash layer since the 1477 Veidivötn ash. However we can see sometimes faint layers from recent eruptions. One black layer around 5cm is probably the VEI5 Katla 1918. One faint white layer at 8cm is probably Hekla 1845 eruption. And a faint dark layer around 12cm is probably Laki 1783 (but it could have been the eruptions of Katla in 1755 or 1721; not visible in Fig.5).

FIGURE 5. Ash layers from recent eruptions in Iceland. There are not as continuous as the bigger ones, they only appear here and there. One can also see that the main white layer are actually two distinct white bands. The ash of 1477 is also double but because it started as a first eruption of rhyolite pink ash from Torfajökull, followed by basaltic brown ash of Veidivötn later. Photograph by Irpsit, all rights belonging to him, used by permission.

ICELANDIC ASH RECORDED IN GREENLAND

FIGURE 6. Again, an overview of the soil profile, but now using the initial picture form part I, and color enhanced. It’s exciting to contemplate the history of 10.000 years of eruptions in such a small soil wall. Photograph by Irpsit, all rights belonging to him, used by permission.

To finish today I read some papers that described which ash layers appeared in Greenland ice cores. We find there the 1362 Öraefajokull, 1104 Hekla, 870 Vatnaöldur ash, Hekla 3 and Hekla 4 eruptions, the very large ash layers of Saksunarvatn/ Grimsvötn (8000 BC) and Vedde / Katla (10000 BC), followed by many ash layers from Katla, Hekla or Grimsvötn, and finally other two very large ash layers: one from Tindfjallajökull Thorsmörk ignimbrite, 53.000 years ago (that was a VEI6+, and possibly even a VEI7). The volcano is still dormant now and right next to Katla and Eyjafjallajökull); the other big eruption was 300.000 years ago, and hypothesized to be from Krafla or Hofsjökull.

After this lenghty post, please feel free to call me a big ash hole.

IRPSIT

Editors note: Do click on the images, then you will see all of the details since they are rather large.

Update by Spica:
Here is the link to part I of the story.

Icelands forgotten Volcanoes

Eldgigur seen from the Hágöngur volcano.

Sometimes a bit of honest digging will pay off in the oddest ways. Trying to utilize an unexpected free day I decided to find an alternative explanation for the uplift associated with the Hamarinn volcano. A long shot as good as any other to pursue on a rather grey day.

While on the prowl for this unknown central volcano I got a lead, and started to dig. To my surprise I found an old (1952) geological report from a Danish survey that seemed to have something to do with my suspected culprit. To my utter surprise it was about another equally unknown volcano. And as if this was not enough, it also named a few other volcanoes I had never heard about.

Image taken from the linked paper below. It shows very well the Grimsvötn fissure swarm as it goes to the SSW through Thordharhyrna volcano.

As you can see on the image the top most volcano is one of the more infamous on Iceland, Grimsvötn. And that one does not merit a lot place here, more than the obvious mentioning of its southern fissure swarm that ends up in Laki. Most of you know already that Grimsvötn was the responsible parent volcano for the Laki rifting fissure eruption, and that Thordharhyrna erupted simultaneously with Grimsvötn and Laki.

But hand on the heart, how many of you knew about Háabunga central volcano? Well, some of the more volcanoholic of the readers of this blog probably do know about it. I did at least. Also Thordharhyrna is well known, but there the fun probably ends for the readers of the blog.

SSW of Thordharhyrna resides a volcano I never had heard of before, Geirvörtur. About this one I cannot say much, at least more than that it resides on top of the Grimsvötn fissure swarm, and that probably is a remote sub feature of Grimsvötn.

SSW to Geirvörtur we have the 1200 meter high volcano of Hágöngur. And know it is starting to get really exiting. Close by to Hágöngur is the SE is the 854 meter high post-glacial volcano of Eldgigur. It resides on the Grimsvötn fissure swarm, but it is doubtful that it is magmatic subset. This is due to the rather odd nature of the lava.

Eldgigur seen from the other side.

Technically this is a very large scoriae cone, at the top resides two small and one large crater. Only the larger crater has produced a minute lava flow. The rest of the volcano is built up of 3 layers of different lavas showing as 3 concentric slag walls.

The cone is built up by very fine grained material filled in with bombs. The first type of lava is a black plagioclase containing phenocrysts of clinopyroxene. The second layer is a grey more evolved and crystallized lava that is translucent. It is a type of plagioclase-porphyric lava. The third lava is named as bytownite, be that as it may, the content of iron is high in the red lava with 15 percent by volume. Inside all 3 types of lava are found layers of clear colorless olivine (forsterite).

The size of the grain is very small, 2 millimeters and downwards. Inside of this are lava bombs prolific. Especially the red lava and black lava seems to have produced a lot of lava bombs during eruptions. The grey translucent lava and the forsterite seems to have produced significantly less lava bombs.

The lavas point to a totally atypical form of eruption for the Grimsvötn line. The eruptions seems to have been very explosive for the size of this volcano. Noteworthy is that Eldgigur shows no sign of being affected by ice, nor water, so all 3 of the eruptions has happened after the end of the latest ice age. Ice would have affected the shape of the volcano due to its loose lavas, and water would have weathered the olivine.

Iceland is famous for having 27 active volcanoes. This is the believed number of volcanoes that has erupted after the last ice age, and has the ability to erupt again. Clearly Eldgigur has had 3 eruptions after the last ice age, and due to the lack of weathering of the olivine, the last of them should have been during the last 2000 years, probably a lot later than that. So, I think I can safely say that Iceland just got a number 28 to worry about.

With weathering of olivine I mean that pulverized forsterite will decay from a member of the olivine family into a member of the carbomagnesian family due to magnesiums very reactive capabilities as it gets into contact with water and CO2. A centimeter thick layer of powdered forsterite will decay completely within 3 to 5 years if it is left in the open air. So, you can actually date it.


http://2dgf.dk/xpdf/bull-1952-12-2-222-226.pdf

CARL

Edinburgh – Volcanic heart of Scotland

 

Image from Wikipedia. Arthurs Seat, Edinburgh.

Edinburgh – home of the Scottish Parliament, Military Tattoo, Princes Street and gardens, Scott memorial, Murrayfield, Valvona and Crolla’s food emporium, sundry pubs (!), volcanoes…Eh, volcanoes?

Surprising as it may be to some people, Edinburgh plays host to a great variety of igneous rocks. The most obvious and in our case, the most interesting, are the volcano remnants of Arthur’s Seat, and the Castle Rock. These are long extinct and date from the Lower Carboniferous, about 350 million years ago. Arthur’s Seat, the larger of these, is assumed to be the main structure, the other a subsidiary, or satellite vent. These are central pipe vents from pipe conduits, cf linear conduits as associated with fissure eruptions.

The rock of Arthur’s Seat is mainly a vent agglomerate with several crystal phyric microgabbro eruption pipes (Lions Head and Lions Haunch vents so called as at a distance the remnants resemble a lion lying down) – agglomerate being a mix of explosive block and vent collapse debris, ash and lava, whilst crystal phyric refers to the presence of some minerals present with larger crystals than the background rock. The presence of gabbro in the conduit pipes indicates these volcanoes erupted a basaltic lava, gabbro being the intrusive coarse grained equivalent to basalt being of the same mineralogical composition. (Dolerite, or Diabase to some authors, again has the same composition, but has a grain size intermediate between basalt and gabbro and is usually assigned to these rocks when found in dyke and sill intrusions). The combined vent material as mapped, gives an irregular vent of 750-1000 metres across.

Picture of pipe brecciated St Austell granite to illustrate vent agglomerate appearance; a true vent agglomerate has a much larger fragment range in both size and composition however.

Photograph by Alan C who gratiously has bestowed the rights to the Volcano café. Pipe brecciated St Austell granite

The opening picture shows the main vents of the Lions Head (left) and Lions Haunch (right) in the background, with Salisbury Crags in front; these are the quarried remains of a post volcanic episode Teschenite (olivine analcime microgabbro – analcime is a hydrous sodic zeolite mineral comparable to feldspathoids; zeolite minerals usually being associated with vesicle-filling in amygdaloidal basalt flows) sill intruded into sub-volcanic sediments of Lower Carboniferous age.

Salisbury Crags are part of a site dedicated to James Hutton, who has been called the ‘Father of Geology’. It was here that Hutton part formulated his theory of Uniformitarianism, that confounded the existing Neptunism movement that insisted the Earth dated from the biblical Great Flood, by siting the presence of a rock of obvious molten origin being intruded into sediments/volcanic rock, the sediments being just visible below the sill.

Distal from the volcano, mapping and borehole evidence shows there to be up to 250metres thickness of tuffs and lavas adjacent to the vent and in the Midlothian borehole, some 10km to the south east, approximately 70m of volcanic material was found at the horizon of the Arthurs Seat volcanics.

Castle Rock is the erosional core of a relatively small and assumed satellite volcano off Arthurs Seat, composed of microgabbro approximately 150 metres in diameter. The vent again cuts through shallow water marine sediments of Lower Carboniferous – Dinantian – age. These sediments comprise predominantly sandstones and minor shale horizons; but it should be noted that in some texts the sediments erroneously are noted as limestones, a confusion arising from the rocks of this age being assigned to the Carboniferous Limestone division.

Picture from rampantscotland.com showing Castle Rock and vent.

The reference cited here below gives an artists impression of Edinburgh with the two volcanoes superimposed along with an imaginary sea level – with a lot of imagination this image could well have been a Carboniferous equivalent of El Hierro (Arthurs Seat complete with aerial cone) and our Bob (Castle Rock)!


http://www.geo.ed.ac.uk/arthurseat/geology/overlay.html

Image of how Edinburgh would have looked like during the "interesting times".

More recently, during the last Ice Age, ice sheet movement has produced a classic example of a ‘crag-and-tail’ with the Castle Rock – the crag – protecting the bedded Carboniferous sediments of the Royal Mile – the tail – from ice erosion, indicating mass ice movement from the west. More recently, the ice-deepened gouge channel on the north side (Princes Street gardens) has been utilised by the railway as an ideal route through the city!

Image from Google Earth.

And finally;

Image from from http://www.irocks.com/db_pics/pics/d06-238a.jpg Mystery stone...

ALAN C